The
Rushford Report Archives
|
Entrepreneurs
overcome shrimp trade war
|
December 6, 2007 Beleaguered U.S. shrimpers who ply coastal waters from Texas to the Carolinas launched a trade war in 2003 that resulted in antidumping tariffs ranging from 4 percent to more than 100 percent on shrimp imports from six Latin American and Asian nations. At one level, the litigation offers some basic economic lessons. The foreigners with their modern aquaculture had the comparative advantage over the U.S. shrimp fleet, which hadn’t changed much in 50 years. Supply and demand also came into play. The foreigners could supply U.S. demand for America’s most popular seafood, while the U.S. shrimp fleet couldn’t. And, as always, with economics come statistics, the most telling of which is that despite the tariffs, U.S. shrimp imports have risen from some $3 billion the year before the case was filed to more than $4 billion last year. But while economic theories drive the shrimp war, the trade warriors themselves are not theoretical people. A look at the war’s front lines through the eyes of three successful shrimpers themselves reveals insights beyond dry economics.
Chauvin, Ngo and Luesukprasert have fought on different fronts of the shrimp war. But in their entrepreneurial drive and determination to overcome hardship, tariffs or no tariffs, these trade warriors are very much alike. Greg
Rushford is editor and publisher of The Rushford Report, a Washington
monthly newsletter on trade politics at www.RushfordReport.com.
|